THE MARSTON CHRONICLES

America's Online Newspaper - Updates Every Minute
Browse Over 225 Areas We Cover Using the Alphabetical Green Menu
FOR HELP, LETTERS TO THE EDITOR OR SUGGESTIONS FOR A NEW SUBJECT, CLICK HERE
All Subjects
Front Page
About Us
Africa
Algeria
Anguilla
Antigua & Barbuda
Archaeology
Argentina
Arts Reviews
Aruba
Asia
Astronomy
Australia
Austria
Autism Spectrum Disorder
Automotive
Bahamas
Bangladesh
Barbados
Baseball, MLB
Basketball, NBA
Basketball, NCAA
Beauty
Belarus
Belgium
Belize
Bermuda
Best Sellers
Bi-Polar Disorder
Biology
Bolivia
Books
Brazil
Buddhism
Business
Canada
Cancer
Cayman Islands
Celebrities
Central Africa
Central America
Central Asia
Central Europe
Chemistry
Christianity
Climate
Chile
China
Colombia
Columnists
Company Earnings
Costa Rica
Cuba
Czech Republic
Dear Abby
Denmark
Depression
Diabetes
Dominica
Dominican Republic
East North Central
East South Central
Eastern Africa
Eastern Asia
Eastern Europe
Ecuador
Editorials
Egypt
El Salvador
Electronics
Energy
Entertainment
Environment
Europe
European Economy
Falkland Islands
Fashion
Featured Articles
Finland
Football, NFL
Foreign News
France
French Guiana
French West Africa
Geology
Germany
Golf
Greece
Grenada
Guadeloupe
Guatemala
Guyana
Haiti
Health
Heart Disease
Hinduism
Hockey, NHL
Home and Garden
Honduras
Hong Kong SAR
Horn of Africa
Horoscopes
Hungary
India
Indonesia
Internet Security
Iran
Iraq
Ireland
Islam
Israel
Italy
Jamaica
Japan
Jewelry
Judaism
Kazakhstan
Kuwait
LDS/Mormon
Letters to the Editor
Malaysia
Martinique
Melanesia
Mexico
Micronesia
Middle Atlantic
Middle East
Montserrat
Morocco
Mountain
Movies
Music
NASCAR
Netherlands
Netherlands Antilles
New England
New Zealand
Nicaragua
Nigeria
North America
Northern Africa
Northern Asia
Northern Europe
Norway
Obesity
Oddball News
Op-Ed Section
Pacific
Pakistan
Panama
Paraguay
Periodicals
Personal Finance
Peru
Pharmaceutical Industry
Philippines
Physics
Poland
Politics
Polling Information
Polynesia
Portugal
Protestant
Puerto Rico
PUMA Coaltion
Real Estate
Religion
Religious Persecution
Roman Catholic
Romania
RSS Feeds
Russia
Saudi Arabia
Science
Singapore
Slovakia
Small Business
South Africa
South America
South Atlantic
South Korea
South Pacific
Southeastern Asia
Southeastern Europe
Southern Africa
Southern Asia
Southern Europe
Southwestern Asia
Southwestern Europe
Spain
Sports
St Barthelemy
St Kitts & Nevis
St Lucia
St-Martin/St. Maarten
St Pierre & Miquelon
St Vincent & the Grenadines
Stage & Performing Arts
Stock Markets
Suriname
Sweden
Switzerland
Taiwan
Technology
Television
Tennis
Thailand
Toys & Games
Travel
Trinidad & Tobago
Turkey
Turks & Caicos Islands
Ukraine
United Arab Emirates
United Kingdom
United States
U.S. Economy
Uruguay
Venezuela
Vietnam
Virgin Islands
Watches
West Indies
West North Central
West South Central
Western Africa
Western Europe
World Economy
Front Page
The McCain-Palin Landslide
THE MCCAIN-PALIN LANDSLIDE

Based on everything I have learned about predicting elections in 45 years of doing this, I predict a McCain-Palin landslide. What is the basis for making such a prediction? Under normal circumstances, you can successfully predict any given partisan election based on the previous three elections. The most recent election is weighted for 25% of the prediction, the second one back is weighted for 22.5% and the third one back is weighted for 2.5%. Then the trend towards one party, if any, is factored in for 50% of the prediction. In statewide elections or smaller, you apply this formula to each precinct and then aggregate the results. In nationwide elections, you apply the formula to each county and then aggregate them for a final prediction.

Of course, this system fails if some unusual factor changes the previous trends. The only unusual factor in this election is the race of one of the candidates. There is no way to predict how that factor will play out because there are no precedents. Assuming that the race factor has an equal number of plus and minus factors, the trends point to a McCain-Palin landslide.

The next question is how could I possibly be so sure when the polls are predicting the exact opposite? Because the polls do not seem to be properly taking into account the P.U.M.A. Factor. I have explained previously that the mere fact that the polls violently disagree with each other is proof of something seriously amiss with the polling models. See my article on The P.U.M.A. Factor. On November 1st, I posted an article entitled How Big is the P.U.M.A. Factor?

That article pointed out, that at the time I wrote it, it required only a total of 493,636 PUMA voters in North Carolina, Florida, Ohio, Virginia, and Colorado to produce a tie in the electoral votes. Add a mere 35,935 more in Nevada and McCain-Palin wins. At the time, it seemed very likely that there were 529,571 PUMA voters in those six states, but I waited another 24 hours to see if that continued to be the case. Now the trend is confirming that a McCain-Palin landslide is in the works. It is amazing how few people in politics never apply some fairly simple mathematics to see what should happen in the next election. At this point the only unpredictable factor is the matter of turnout. If Obama can turn out the minorities for him in massive numbers then all bets are off. Given normal turnout in a presidential election, McCain-Palin should win handily.

UPDATE: I have posted an updated article predicting an 81 electoral vote margin for McCain-Palin called
McCain-Palin 310 Obama-Biden 228
. Click on the link to go there.